Each month, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) releases data from the monthly "Household Survey" conducted by the Bureau of the Census, providing a comprehensive body of information on the employment and unemployment experience of the U.S. population, classified by age, sex, race, and a variety of other characteristics.
The BLS also conducts the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program, surveying about 150,000 businesses and government agencies, representing approximately 390,000 individual work sites, in order to provide detailed industry data on employment, hours, and earnings of workers on nonfarm payrolls.
The BLS compiles information from these sources and announces the monthly "Employment Situation," reporting the current U.S. employment and unemployment data estimates. The monthly announcement reports employment data from the previous full month.
This lesson focuses on the April 5, 2013, BLS announcement, "Employment Situation: March, 2013." The lesson will also look at the relationship of employment and unemployment data to other macroeconomic data, such as GDP and CPI, and business cycles.
In this lesson, you will:
- Review the most recently reported U.S. employment and unemployment data.
- Determine the changes in U.S. employment and unemployment from the past month and year.
- Determine the factors that have influenced the change in the U.S. unemployment rate.
- Explain the implications of the employment and unemployment data for individuals, population groups, and the U.S. economy.
In March, 2013, U.S. non-farm employment increased by just 88,000 jobs. Over the past six months, monthly employment growth had averaged 197,000 jobs. 268,000 U.S. jobs were created in February, 2013, alone. What happened in March ?
The U.S. unemployment rate dropped to 7.6 percent with a decrease in the number of unemployed by 290,000, but also a decrease in the size of the labor force of 496,000. In March, there were 290,000 fewer unemployed persons, but, according to the BLS Household Survey, there were also 206,000 fewer employed persons. How can that be?
Once again, the two surveys that determine the BLS "Employment Situation" announcement give us a mixed message about the health of the U.S. labor market. What do these labor market numbers really mean? Take a look at the April 5, 2013, BLS announcement.
The Employment Situation – March 2013
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Released April 5, 2013
"Nonfarm payroll employment edged up in March (+88,000), and the unemployment rate was little changed at 7.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment grew in professional and business services and in health care but declined in retail trade."
Note: Unless otherwise cited, all quoted materials in this lesson are from the April 5, 2013, BLS "Employment Situation - March 2012" news release. URL: [EEL-link id='3948' title='bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_04052013.htm' ]
Initially, the "headline" numbers seem like good news. There were 88,000 more jobs according to employers. The unemployment rate decreased to 7.6 percent according to the surveyed households.
March 2013 Employment and Unemployment Data Highlights
- The number of unemployed people in the U.S. decreased by 290,000 to 11,742,000.
- The number of employed persons in the U.S. decreased by 206,000 to 143,286,000.
- The national unemployment rate fell by 0.1 percent in March to 7.6 percent.
- The unemployment rate has declined by 0.6 percentage point since March, 2012.
- The unemployment rates decreased for adult men, and all ethnic groups.
- The unemployment rate remained the same for adult women.
- The unemployment rate for teens (age 16-19) decreased 0.9 percent to 24.2 percent.
Figure 1, below, shows the basic U.S. labor force data for March, 2013. Take a good look at the March 2013 data. Do you see any data that impacts you or your family's current life or future?
Students: Are you clear about the components of the labor forcr data that are used to determone the unemployment rate? Understanding the various components puts the reported unemployment rate into perspective.
Figure 2, below, provides more unemployment data for the month of March, 2013, including unemployment rates by race or ethnicity and educational attainment. Do you see any interesting data?
Students: For more information about the unemployment rates for people with various levels of education, go to the BLS web page “Education Pays.” Link: [EEL-link id='2503' title='bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm' ] . What is the relationship between edcuational attainment and the chance of being unemployed?
Critics of the BLS labor market data argue that the extent of unemployment is understated in the BLS announcements. To fully understand the current "employment situation," you have to look at the history.
- Many people who were once in the labor force are no longer seeking work. The BLS reported that the civilian labor force participation rate decreased from 63.5 percent to 63.3 percent, and the employment-population ratio decreased by 0.1 percent to 58.65 percent. Until the end of 2008, the labor force participation rate had consistently been over 66 percent for the previous 20 years. The employment-population ratio had been between 62 and 64 percent since 1993. Why do you think these rates of labor force participation remain so low?
- Part-time workers. The BLS also reported, "the number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) fell by 350,000 over the month to 7.6 million. These individuals were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job."
- Some people have simply given-up looking for jobs. The BLS reported, "In March, 2.3 million persons were marginally attached to the labor force, essentially unchanged from a year earlier. (The data are not seasonally adjusted.) These individuals were not in the labor force, wanted and were available for work, and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months. They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey." If jobs were available, do you think these people would seek them and become counted as in the labor force?
A note about the marginally attached, workers: "Among the marginally attached, there were 803,000 discouraged workers in March, little changed from a year earlier. (These data are not seasonally adjusted.) Discouraged workers are persons not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. The remaining 1.5 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in March had not searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities."
Should those who are not able to find full-time work be counted as unemployed?
Students: What about counting the marginally attached and discouraged workers as unemployed? Technically, if they did not seek employment, they are not “unemployed.” In your opinion, what does this say about the “accuracy” of the reported unemployment rate?
Establishment Survey Data – Employment Data
The Establishment Survey measures, among other things, employment trends in various industry groups.
"Total nonfarm payroll employment edged up in March (+88,000). Over the prior 12 months, employment growth had averaged 169,000 per month. In March, employment increased in professional and business services and in health care, while retail trade employment declined."
Since the recession low number of 153,320,000 employed in February, 2010, the economy has had a net gain of 5.875 million jobs, to date.
Industry Employment Change Highlights, March 2013
Take a look at the change in the employment levels for the major industry groups in March, 2013, in Figure 3, below.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) announced that the 2008-2009 recession ended in June, 2009, but significant job growth did not begin until many months later. U.S. non-farm employment has increased by just over 9.1 million jobs in the past year (March 2012 to March 2013).
Business Cycles and Unemployment
Figure 4, below, shows the monthly U.S. unemployment rates from 1990 to the present. Note the “up and down” cycles of high and low unemployment over time period. These generally follow the “business cycles.” Periods of very high unemployment are typically correlated with period of slowing or decreasing GDP growth.
Students: Are you clear abou the meaning of the “business cycle.” The NBER web page defines busies cycles and the factors used by the Business Cycle Dating Committee to identify recessions. NBER Business Cycle URL: http://www.nber.org/cycles/main.html
Macroeconomic Data - Business Cycles, Employment, GDP and CPI
The economy moves in continuous periods of growth and decline called business cycles. The cycle primarily represents growth and decline of gross domestic product (GDP) and employment, and may also represent other measurements of the general health of the economy. When the economy is in a state of declining GDP and employment it may be in a recession. Let's take a look at how the three macroeconomic measurements in the "Focus on Economic Data" lesson series compare recently and over the last few years. Figure 5, below, illustrates a typical business cycle, from trough to a period of growth, to the peak, to a period of decline, and back to a trough.
Employment and Other Macroeconomic Data
Employment and Unemployment (Recap of this Month’s Data)
"Nonfarm payroll employment edged up in March (+88,000), and the unemployment rate was little changed at 7.6 percent. Employment grew in professional and business services and in health care but declined in retail trade."
After losing over 2.2 million jobs in 2008 and almost 4.7 million jobs in 2009, the U.S. economy reversed the trend since early 2010. As previously stated in this lesson, the economy has gained over 1.6 million jobs since December, 2009. Although the number of U.S. non-farm jobs has been increasing, total non-farm employment is still well-below the high level of 146,595,000 U.S. jobs reported in November, 2007.
Real Gross Domestic Product (Real GDP)
"Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 0.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012 (that is, from the third quarter to the fourth quarter), according to the "third" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP increased 3.1 percent." Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, "Gross Domestic Product, 4th quarter 2012 and annual 2012 (third estimate)," March 28, 2013.
The U.S. rate of GDP growth fell-off considerably in 2008, the beginning of the recession. 2008 saw decreases in real GDP in three of four quarters. The losses continued through the second quarter of 2009, when growth began again. In 2010, U.S. real GDP increased at an annual rate of 2.4 percent. In 2011, the U.S. GDP growth rate slowed somewhat to 1.8 percent. In 2012, the annual real GDP growth rate was 2.2 percent, but had slowed to a 0.4 percent annualized growth rate in Q4.
Students: Can you explain how the rate of GDP growth and changes in employment might be related?
Consumer Price Index
"On a seasonally adjusted basis, the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 0.7 percent in February after being unchanged in January. The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.2 percent in February after rising 0.3 percent in January."
Although many people fear future inflation as a result of the rising federal debt and continued problems in some financial markets, there has been little evidence of inflationary pressures in recent years. The most significant inflation pressure has been fro fluctuating energy prices.
Students" How do you think inflation affects people's consumer and saving decisions? Do people spend less if they think prices are rising? Or, might they spend more in the short-run?
Monetary Policy – Federal Funds Rate
Through its last meeting in March, 2013, the Federal Reserve System’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has kept its target for the federal funds rate at 0 - 1/4 percent, the level established in December 16, 2008. The FOMC again stated in March that the rate will be kept low in the near future. The intent of the low interest rate policy is to stimulate the economy by making borrowing - for consumption and investment – cheaper.
Students: How does recent Federal Reserve monetary policy reflect the state of the economy?
Students: Is this employment report good news or bad news about the U.S. economy? Why?
Once again, the BLS reported that payroll employment increased by just 88,000 jobs in March, 2013. The drop in the employment rate was primarily a result of the change in the size of the labor force.
The pace of job growth seems to have slowed from the increases in the past few months. Even with a string of monthly job gains, over 11 million Americans remain unemployed and many more are underemployed or have given-up looking for jobs.
There is still some fear that this recovery will be "jobless," meaning that the increased output is from improved capital resources and productivity increases, not more employed workers.
Some people are questioning the traditional concept of the "natural rate of unemployment" and the level considered to be "full employment." Remember, full employment may include those who are frictionally unemployed (changing jobs) and some who are structurally unemployed and the jobs they seek no longer exist where they seek them. The "real" full employment level of unemployment may be those who are cyclically unemployed - not working because of inadequate demand for the products they produce.
Estimates of the full employment level of unemployment range from 2 to 7 percent. For the fifteen years prior to the 2008-2009 recession, the U.S. unemployment rate fluctuated between 4 and 6 percent, with one month below 4 percent, the 3.8 percent low level in April, 2000. There are still over 11 million unemployed people in the United States.
Is the "real" level of unemployment 6.7 percent? If we subtract, say, 5 percent for the frictionally and some structurally unemployed, is the "real" rate 1.7%. Are these the people we can expect to be re-employed as the economy reaches a peak in the current business cycle?
Then again, what if we add the marginally attached and part-time workers? Should the real unemployment rate be higher?
Students: Write a rationale for one of these as the "official" announced measurement of the unemployment rate:
1. The unemployment rate as the percentage of the labor force who are not employed by the current BLS definition.
2. The unemployment rate as the percentage of the labor force who unemployed plus those who are "discouraged" and have given up looking for work.
3. The unemployment rate as the unemployed, discouraged workers and those working part-time for economic reasons, as a percentage of the labor force.
How do other economic indicators compare to the recent changes in real GDP, unemployment rate, consumer price index, and the federal funds rate target? Take a look at some of the indicators listed below.
The Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators is published monthly. The ten components of The Conference Board Leading Economic Index® for the U.S. include:
- Average weekly hours, manufacturing
- Average weekly initial claims for unemployment insurance
- Manufacturers’ new orders, consumer goods and materials
- Index of supplier deliveries – vendor performance
- Manufacturers' new orders, nondefense capital goods
- Building permits, new private housing units
- Stock prices, 500 common stocks
- Money supply, M2
- Interest rate spread, 10-year Treasury bonds less federal funds
- Index of consumer expectations
Access the Leading Indicators: [EEL-link id='3013' title='conference-board.org/data/bcicountry.cfm?cid=1' ]
- How does the indicator reflect the current economic problems?
- Is the recent history of the indicator similar or related to the GDP, unemployment, or CPI?
- How are people or businesses impacted by the economic data?