Online Lesson
About this lesson
grade level: 9-12
![]()
curriculum standards:
5
7
16
![]()
![]()
More lessons from this author
![]()
posted on: May 24, 2004![]()
State Standards
![]()
Printable Glossary
![]()
Teacher's Version
This lesson provides you with the resources that you will need to teach this lesson. We have also provided a link for your students to follow this lesson online. The link below contains only the information your students need:
U.S. farmers and the Cuban embargo
Key Economic Concepts:
This lesson explores trade barriers in general and why some U.S. farmers want one specific trade barrier, the Cuban embargo, completely eliminated.
Students will:
Trade barriers are often put in place to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Diverse industries such as
automobiles, rice, and steel have all had some protection in the form of trade barriers. Embargos, which completely prohibit trade with another country, are imposed for political reasons. Many U.S. citizens are opposed to the Cuban embargo for different reasons.
Cuba’s Development and Trade with U.S. Midwestern States: Farm Bureau briefing on trip by U.S. farmers to Cuban
www.uiowa.edu/ifdebook/conferences/cuba/TLCP/Volume%201/Carrasco.pdf
[4]
A Voice of Agriculture news article" Discusses midwestern U.S. states trade interests with Cuba
http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2003/10/20_schmitzr_cubatrade
[2]
Indiana Farm Bureau article: Outlines of Indiana farming and organization.
www.infarmbureau.org/
[5]
The Cuba Policy Foundation: Discusses the goals and functions of the Cuba Policy Foundation
www.cubafoundation.org/
[6]
Students learn what trade barriers are and why they are enacted. They also learn why some U.S. farmers see Cuba as another market in which to sell their products.
Trade barriers include embargos, tariffs, quotas and voluntary export restraints. Embargos prohibit any kind of trade with another country. Tariffs are taxes that raise the price of a good when it is brought into another country. Quotas place limits on how much of a good can be brought into a country. Voluntary export restraints also limit the quantity of a good brought into a country, but they are initiated by the country producing the good, not the country receiving the good. A matching exercise allows the students to correctly match the situation to the type of trade barrier. Have the students complete this pop-up activity to review these terms. The questions and answers are listed below.
This may be a good time to reinforce the idea that trade barriers are designed to protect some industries but, in fact they may hurt other industries or even consumers. Economists have found that sanctions don't often reach their political objectives and they come with high costs. A good example is the steel tariff imposed by the Bush administration, on foreign-made steel. President Bush imposed the tariffs, ranging from 8 percent to 30 percent, on some kinds of foreign steel in March 2002, in order to help the U.S. steel industry compete with foreign steel producers. Many U.S. manufacturing companies that use steel, including manufacturers of auto parts and appliances, say that the steel tariffs have raised costs for manufacturers and caused thousands of manufacturing losses. Also, people who buy cars or appliances may have to pay higher prices because of the steel tariffs. The U.S. International Trade Commission recently concluded that the tariffs have caused a $30 million net loss to the U.S. economy. In addition, the European Union is considering retaliatory tariffs against the U.S.
Have students review the following website that supports the argument of trade barriers not being in the best interest for a country at times:
- www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa064.html
[1]
The following is a brief timeline of the Cuban embargo:
1960 - The Eisenhower administration imposed a partial embargo, excluding food and medicine.
1963 - The Kennedy administration prohibited travel to Cuba and made financial and commercial transactions with Cuba illegal for U.S. citizens
1977 - President Carter drops the ban on travel to Cuba and on U.S. citizens spending dollars in Cuba
1981 - President Reagan reestablishes the travel ban and prohibits U.S. citizens from spending money in Cuba.
2003 - Congress eased restrictions on travel to Cuba.
Student questions:
What political or historical events do you think influenced the Cuban embargo? [1960 - Castro came to power in 1959; 1963 - this was after the Cuban missile crisis of 1962; 1981 - Reagan wanted a tougher anti-communist stance; 2002 - After 40 years, many think the embargo has not worked and is hurting certain U.S. industries and may actually be helping Castro.]
Students read a news article on a Minnesota farmer: http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2003/10/20_schmitzr_cubatrade/
[2]
and answer the following questions.
Students then read an article about the Indiana Farm Bureau at www.infarmbureau.org/NewsRelease.aspx?id=2134&terms=cuba [3]
Based on the readings above, why do you think that many farmers and the Indiana Farm Bureau now favor for repealing the
Cuban Embargo? [To increase the market and sell more farm products.] Why do you think some politicians, such as Indiana Senator Evan Bayh, support repealing the embargo? [Probably to win votes from Indiana farmers; also to acknowledgement that the embargo has been in place over 40 years and has not brought about the desired change in Cuba desired, which is the overthrow of Fidel Castro.]
Compared to other trade barriers, embargos are enacted more for political than for economic reasons. Instead of protecting domestic industries, embargos may be designed to punish another country through economic means. Judging the success of the Cuban embargo depends on knowing what its intended result was. If, as many believe, the embargo was intended to drive Fidel Castro from power, it has certainly not worked. If it was intended to keep the United States and Cuba apart , then most would find it has been successful. If the embargo is eliminated, most would expect increased trade between the U.S. and Cuba. As suggested by the news articles, agricultural producers would probably be the main beneficiaries if the embargo were repealed; other potential gainers include people in the energy and travel industries.
Hypothesize about what will happen to the prices of agricultural products in Cuba and the United States. Be sure to include reasons why.
For more agricultural information on the impact of the Cuban embargo, see the Farm Bureau briefing given above.
For additional information and recent public opinion polls on the Cuban embargo, see www.cubafoundation.org/
[6]
. This is a website for the Cuba Policy Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to the study of the benefits of expanding trade and people-to-people contact with Cuba.
Links Used:
1. ^ "www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa064.html" - (www.cato.org)
2. ^ ^ "http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2003/10/20_schmitzr_cubatrade" - (news.minnesota.publicradio.org)
3. ^ "www.infarmbureau.org/NewsRelease.aspx?id=2134&terms=cuba" - (www.infarmbureau.org)
4. ^ "www.uiowa.edu/ifdebook/conferences/cuba/TLCP/Volume%201/Carrasco.pdf" - (www.uiowa.edu)
5. ^ "www.infarmbureau.org/" - (www.infarmbureau.org)
6. ^ ^ "www.cubafoundation.org/" - (www.cubafoundation.org)
Be the first to review this lesson!
Insert a comment, suggestion or review of this lesson here. The comments will not appear immediately due to a time delay to allow for a review by a member of our staff.
Follow us