Online Lesson
About this lesson
grade level: 9-12
![]()
curriculum standards:
8
![]()
![]()
More lessons from this author
![]()
posted on: January 26, 1998![]()
State Standards
![]()
Printable Glossary
![]()
Teacher's Version
This lesson provides you with the resources that you will need to teach this lesson. We have also provided a link for your students to follow this lesson online. The link below contains only the information your students need:
Key Economic Concepts:
A lawsuit has been filed by a group of Texas cattlemen who charge that a 1996 Oprah Winfrey show about mad cow disease drove down cattle prices by misleading and frightening consumers. Students will use their understanding of the determinants of supply and demand as well a changes in equilibrium prices to act as expert witnesses on behalf of the both the plaintiff and the defendant.
A lawsuit has been filed by a group of Texas cattlemen who charge that a 1996 Oprah Winfrey show about mad cow disease drove down cattle prices by misleading and frightening consumers. Students will use their understanding of the determinants of supply and demand as well a changes in equilibrium prices to act as expert witnesses on behalf of the both the plaintiff and the defendant. 
Read the article excerpts below to learn more about the Oprah Winfrey trial.
Yahoo:
Oprah Vilified in Court, Adored Outside
"Witness Bill O'Brien, head of plaintiff Texas Beef Producers, said the Winfrey Show, aired on April 15, 1996, caused prices to fall by 7 cents a pound in one day...O'Brien said meat packers, after hearing about the show, started pulling out of the market in droves."
Dallas News :
www.amarillo.com/stories/012798/show.shtml [1]
"Mr. O'Brien detailed how the West Texas cattle market crashed to 10-year lows in the wake of the show. He cited industry figures showing a drop from 62 cents per pound on April 16 to 55 cents eight days later...The defense blames the beef industry's price drop on drought and other factors."
CNN:
O'Brien testified that he heard about an immediate slide in cattle prices after the program aired from contacts in Chicago -- which is home to both Winfrey's show and the mercantile exchange that sets a benchmark for nationwide cattle prices. He responded by notifying his feed yards to start selling off cattle. Within an hour, O'Brien had sold more than 2,000 head. Prices, meanwhile, continued dropping for weeks.
"I didn't try to sell any cattle (later) that week, but from people I talked to, they said the market was dead," said O'Brien, one of several Texas cattle producers suing Winfrey.
Plaintiffs claim that Winfrey's show triggered the market downfall, costing them $10.3 million. They're seeking unspecified punitive damages from Winfrey, her production company Harpo Productions Inc. and show guest Howard Lyman, a food safety activist."
Which determinant of demand led to a demand shift? Did demand increase or decrease after Oprah's television show?
The following information comes from a National Cattlemans' Association report from May 1996.
The amount of beef produced by the beef industry held relatively steady in spite of decreases for several years in the size of the basic cow herd and total cattle herd. That was because of greater output per cow, reflecting heavier average animals, more lean and less waste fat per carcass, and faster turn-over of fed cattle in feedlots. Overall efficiency has improved. Recently the total herd has been expanding again, and beef production is increasing. Production in 1995 was up 3% from a year earlier. With an expanding herd, output will increase further during
the next two years.
Table 2.2
|
|
1994 |
Beef |
Pork |
Total Red |
Poultry |
Total Red Meat |
|
1996 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Jan |
2,220 |
1,550 |
3,823 |
2,753 |
6,576 |
|
|
Feb |
2,048 |
1,417 |
3,519 |
2,628 |
6,147 |
|
|
Mar |
2,034 |
1,421 |
3,513 |
2,625 |
6,138 |
|
|
Apr |
2,153 |
1,484 |
3,691 |
2,702 |
6,393 |
|
Year-To-Date Comparison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
7,729 |
5,893 |
13,828 |
9,825 |
23,648 |
|
|
1996 |
8,455 |
5,872 |
14,546 |
10,712 |
25,258 |
|
|
% of '95 |
96% |
109% |
100% |
105% |
109% |
107% |
Table 4.1
|
Year |
Choice Fed Steers |
650lb Feeder Steers |
450 lb Steer Calves |
Beef Cut-Out Value |
Choice Retail Beef |
All Retail Beef |
Featured Retail Beef |
|
$/cwt |
$/cwt |
$/cwt |
$/cwt |
$/lb. |
$/lb. |
$/lb. |
|
|
1980 |
52.43 |
73.11 |
84.62 |
104.44 |
2.34 |
N/A |
2.31 |
|
1981 |
68.42 |
64.40 |
70.80 |
99.88 |
2.35 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
1982 |
67.97 |
63.32 |
67.93 |
101.31 |
2.38 |
N/A |
2.25 |
|
1983 |
65.05 |
62.71 |
69.30 |
97.83 |
2.34 |
N/A |
N/A |
|
1984 |
65.22 |
64.11 |
69.88 |
100.11 |
2.35 |
N/A |
2.13 |
|
1985 |
63.66 |
63.03 |
71.32 |
90.76 |
2.29 |
N/A |
2.05 |
|
1986 |
66.31 |
60.52 |
69.01 |
88.98 |
2.27 |
N/A |
2.05 |
|
1987 |
60.05 |
73.82 |
84.73 |
97.21 |
2.38 |
2.13 |
2.16 |
|
1988 |
58.93 |
82.71 |
96.47 |
103.28 |
2.50 |
2.25 |
2.26 |
|
1989 |
66.14 |
84.14 |
98.76 |
107.78 |
2.66 |
2.46 |
2.41 |
|
1990 |
70.93 |
89.02 |
103.22 |
116.54 |
2.81 |
2.62 |
2.61 |
|
1991 |
73.94 |
90.72 |
105.69 |
118.31 |
2.88 |
2.71 |
2.62 |
|
1992 |
78.32 |
83.98 |
96.77 |
116.65 |
2.85 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
|
1993 |
76.40 |
88.96 |
103.15 |
119.23 |
2.93 |
2.71 |
2.72 |
|
1994 |
69.28 |
80.07 |
93.42 |
108.57 |
2.83 |
2.65 |
2.59 |
|
1995 |
66.57 |
68.31 |
78.22 |
106.62 |
2.84 |
2.59 |
2.42 |
|
1996 |
65.00 |
59.22 |
64.10 |
101.71 |
2.80 |
2.52 |
2.45 |
* Cattle-Fax Averages
Sources: USDA and Cattle-Fax
(In the retail category, Choice beef prices are averages for all cuts from Choice grade carcasses. "All" retail beef refers to all types of retail cuts -- including Choice, Select and ungraded beef.)
Fed cattle prices have decreased with increases in supplies of beef and other meats, and feeder cattle and calf prices have decreased sharply with increases in corn prices as well as cattle supply increases.
Based on the information in the interviews, how did some cattle producers respond to the show? If most producers responded in a similar way, which determinant of supply led to a supply shift? Did supply increase or decrease? Do the data above support the notion that the quantity of cattle sold increased over the previous year?
Given the expectations about buyer and seller behavior, what would you hypothesize about the direction of change in the market equilibrium price?
If you were an expert witness testifying on behalf of Oprah Winfrey, how would you describe her role in the decline of cattle prices in April 1996? Use graphs and labels to identify the source of demand and/or supply shifts. Write a description about what you think may have happened. Similarly, if were asked to testify on behalf of the plaintiff, what information could you provide that would help them?
Links Used:
1. ^ "www.amarillo.com/stories/012798/show.shtml" - (www.amarillo.com)
Insert a comment, suggestion or review of this lesson here. The comments will not appear immediately due to a time delay to allow for a review by a member of our staff.
Follow us